Users online: 45  Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article


 
Previous article  Table of Contents   Next article
BOOK REVIEW
Surg Neurol Int 2012,  3:13

Neurosurgery case review


Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands

Date of Submission01-Jan-2012
Date of Acceptance01-Jan-2012
Date of Web Publication15-Feb-2012

Correspondence Address:
Pieter L Kubben
Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center
The Netherlands
Login to access the Email id

© 2012 Kubben; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Get Permissions


How to cite this article:
Kubben PL. Neurosurgery case review. Surg Neurol Int 2012;3:13

How to cite this URL:
Kubben PL. Neurosurgery case review. Surg Neurol Int [serial online] 2012 [cited 2014 Oct 24];3:13. Available from: http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2012/3/1/13/92926





   Reference Top


The first edition of this book was edited by Remi Nader and Abdulrahman J. Sabbagh. It was published by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. (New York) in 2009. This soft cover edition on A4 format consists of circa 462 pages content, and a list of abbreviations plus the index at the end.


   Content Top


Seems to cover a broad spectrum of cases in neurosurgical topics that are relevant to be studied. Cases have a good explanation, which broadens the context. Sometimes even schematic drawings are provided in the answers for a better understanding (made by the second author). The layout is rather neat, and the book offers a fresh modern look and is comfortable to handle given its size. After a short while, the book turns out to have one major drawback: the solution of the case presentation is often offered in the title of the correponding chapter! Further, if the case is presented on the left page, answers can already be seen on the right page, which I found both distracting and sometimes demotivating.


   Discussion Top


The concept of the book is well presented, but it turned out that revealing in advance (the chapter's title) what the case is all about was such a huge demotivating factor that I hardly used it. It might have been a different situation if the book was all about surgical treatment, but there is a decision-making part in neurosurgery that the book is trying to teach us, but actually does not. My suggestion would be to change the case titles in such a way that the reader has to do the thinking from the beginning. For the sake of indexing, there might be a second index at the back of the book that connects a topic with a chapter, for easy review.

The book would also benefit from the standard "question-answer" layout that shows the questions on the right page, meaning the reader has to turn the page to read the answers (and cannot do so accidentally). I realize it may take a little bit more of paper, but this is my preference for a book that is supposed to stimulate my thinking. An overview of positive aspects and suggestions for improvement for this book can be found in [Table 1].
Table 1: Overview of positive aspects and suggestions for improvement


Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


Four-star content, but presentation issues reduce the end-score to three stars.



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

 
Top
  
Previous article    Next article

    

 
  Search
 
   Browse articles
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Reference
   Content
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed971    
    Printed52    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded544    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal