Users online: 32  Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Print this article Email this article


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Surg Neurol Int 2010,  1:25

Transcranial approach to pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus: A modification of the classical technique to be used in a low-technology environment


1 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Neurological Centre of Latium "NCL", Rome, Italy; Calixto Garcia University Hospital, La Havana, Cuba,
2 Calixto Garcia University Hospital, La Havana, Cuba
3 Division of Neurosurgery, Hermanos Amejeiras Hospital, La Havana, Cuba

Date of Submission13-Apr-2010
Date of Acceptance28-May-2010
Date of Web Publication01-Jul-2010

Correspondence Address:
Aldo Spallone
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Neurological Centre of Latium "NCL", Rome, Italy; Calixto Garcia University Hospital, La Havana, Cuba

Login to access the Email id

© 2010 Spallone et al; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.65054

PMID: 20847907

Get Permissions

   Abstract 

Objective: Pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus represent a therapeutic challenge. Those tumors have been traditionally treated with incomplete surgical removal, observation and/ or adjunctive medical therapy, and radiotherapy. In relatively recent years, some authors have suggested a main direct surgical approach to cavernous sinus (CS) with the aim of complete removal of the adenoma, either by a modified trans-sphenoidal route, using or not an endoscopy-assisted approach, or by a transcranial direct approach. The latter has the advantage of allowing direct exposure of the lesion with a view of the surgical field unhindered by important neurovascular structures.
Materials and Methods: We report a technical modification of the classical epidural approach for CS adenoma removal. This was used in 14 patients. Surgical technique included a fronto-orbito-zygomatic craniotomy with extradural anterior clinoidectomy, and intradural approach to the Hakuba's triangle for intracavernous dissection. The tumors were removed under direct vision.
Results: Total macroscopical removal was achieved in all but one case. This patient required postoperative radiation therapy as well as adjuvant dopaminergic regime for achieving control of preoperatively increased hormonal values. No other case required radiotherapy. Hormonal and/ or clinical control was also achieved in all the remaining cases. Out of the remaining 13 cases, all appeared to be tumor free at an average postoperative observation at 78 months (34 to 90 months). Significant surgical sequels were detected in only 1 case (persistent 3rd nerve palsy and moderate hemiparesis).
Conclusions: This experience, though limited, would suggest that the transcranial limited CS exposure through the Hakuba's triangle may allow adequate removal of intracavernous pituitary adenomas with very good long-term results and acceptable complication rate.

Keywords: Cavernous sinus surgery, fronto-orbito-zygomatic craniotomy (FOZ), Hakuba′s triangle, invasive adenoma, transcranial approach


How to cite this article:
Spallone A, Vidal RV, Gonzales JG. Transcranial approach to pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus: A modification of the classical technique to be used in a low-technology environment. Surg Neurol Int 2010;1:25

How to cite this URL:
Spallone A, Vidal RV, Gonzales JG. Transcranial approach to pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus: A modification of the classical technique to be used in a low-technology environment. Surg Neurol Int [serial online] 2010 [cited 2014 Jul 23];1:25. Available from: http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2010/1/1/25/65054


   Introduction Top


Surgical management of pituitary adenomas is, as a rule, performed using the trans - sphenoidal route. However, 3% to 7% of pituitary adenomas grow laterally out of the sellar boundaries, [10],[26],[32],[34] and a significant proportion of these tumors invade the cavernous sinus (CS) and represent a management dilemma and difficult-to-treat lesions.

In fact, invasion of the CS has been a reason for considering these lesions not amenable to radical surgery, at least until recent years, [11] and for including postoperative radiation and/ or hormonal therapy in the gold standard of the management of patients harboring these, though histologically benign, tumors. [16],[23],[42]

In relatively recent years, dissection of CS has been introduced mostly by Dolenc [11],[12] in the technical armamentarium of modern neurosurgery, and attempts by several authors [2],[13],[24],[33],[40],[41] to radically remove pituitary adenomas invading the CS have been successful basically the technique described originally by Dolenc. Other authors [8],[14],[19],[31] have reported their experiences with widened inferior approaches, more recently with the aid of endoscopy, [15] again with the aim of maximizing tumor removal. Nevertheless, the majority of pituitary surgeons still prefer to accomplish incomplete trans-sphenoidal removal of an invasive adenoma and to use in some cases postoperative radiotherapy (or better still, radiosurgery [21],[29] ) for obtaining control of residual tumor.

This reluctance to attempt radical surgical removal of these lesions is based on the consideration that adenoma, as a rule, does not present with an aggressive biological behavior; however, it is perhaps also related to the fact that direct CS surgery is a very demanding task. Actually inferior CS approaches would oblige the surgeon to work in very limited, deep, narrow spaces, where the view is hindered by crucial neurovascular structures. Endoscopy can help in overcoming this latter problem [4],[15] but cannot solve the former, i.e., the narrowness of the anatomical spaces and the consequent limited view. [5],[10],[25] Moreover, in an environment where modern neurosurgical technology could be somehow lacking due to economical restraints, neuroendoscopy would not be a possible priority. On the other hand, transcranial dissection, either sub-epidural or epidural, [11],[12],[18] is technically a demanding, not risk-free surgical maneuver, which can be considered routine only in very experienced hands. [12],[22]

In an 8-year period (1997-2005), we managed 17 cases of pituitary adenoma with definite invasion of CS. The first 3 cases were operated using the epidural approach described by Dolenc [11],[12] and Kawase. [18] All these cases showed the expected complete oculomotor paralysis following surgery, which however regressed 3 to 6 months after operation.

The remaining 14 cases were operated using a modification of the subdural approach, which made, in our opinion, the surgery significantly easier though apparently not less effective than the original technique superbly illustrated and recently revised by Dolenc. [12] This technique is described here.


   Materials and Methods Top


In the 6-year period covered by the present study (1999-2005), 14 patients harboring a pituitary adenoma invading the CS were operated upon either in the Nuova Clinica Latina (presently Neurological Centre of Latium, NCL), Rome, Italy; or in the H. Amejeiras Hospital, La Havana, Cuba.

There were 10 women and 4 men aged 24 to 49 years (average, 40.5 years). The presenting symptoms were mostly headache, amenorrhea-galactorrhea and decreased libido. Total preoperative ophthalmoplegia was observed in 2 patients [Table 1]. The tumors' endocrinological characteristics are summarized in [Table 2]. Preoperative and postoperative hormonal values were checked with radioimmunoassay, and reference values are also specified in the table.

CT scan was performed in all the present cases; and MRI, in the most recent 10 cases. CS invasion was staged 3 in 8 cases, and 4 in 6 cases, according to the scale proposed by Knosp et al.,[20] in order to evaluate objectively the invasion of the CS [Figure 1]. In the 4 cases in which only CT scanning was performed, the internal carotid artery (ICA) represented the landmark for staging CS tumor invasion. This artery had close relationships with the lesion in all the present cases and was surrounded by the tumor in several of them.

The goal of surgical management was to achieve total removal of the lesion in order to allow discharging the patient without any adjuvant postoperative treatment whenever possible. Postoperative clinical and neuroimaging data were available for all patients with a follow-up of 34 to 103 months (average, 83.1 + 3.4 months). In particular, serial clinical and neuroimaging follow-ups were performed at regular intervals in the two Italian patients, whilst a recent follow-up evaluation was conducted during the second half of the year 2009 in all Cuban patients.

Surgical technique

A fronto-orbito-zygomatic (FOZ) approach, as described in a previous paper, [36] complemented by an extradural clinoidectomy, was used in all patients. The dura is opened in a 'T' fashion along the Sylvian fissure and the fronto-temporal base. Dural incision is prolonged in the direction of the dura propria of the optic nerve for approximately 2 cm (not to the orbit!). Ipsilateral optic nerve and the ICA are mobilized first, followed by contralateral optic nerve up to the chiasma. Tumor capsule is incised in the interoptic space, and the tumor is removed with suction, bipolar coagulation and microcurettes. Next, tumor is removed from the ipsilateral optico-carotid space; this maneuver is highly facilitated by the mobility of the neurovascular structures obtained, thanks to the approach. If the tumor has eroded the sellar opening, at this stage it is usually possible to enter the sella via the diaphragm from the interoptic space, and/ or along the ICA at the origin of the ophthalmic artery, using the corridors which the tumor has created during its expansion. Unavoidably, some blind maneuvers, careful ones, using microcurettes and curved suckers are obligatory. However, the final result of these maneuvers as far as radicality of tumor removal can be checked with a mirror (or an endoscope) inserted into the sella via a widened sellar opening from the interoptic space. If this is not possible due to limited sellar opening, an intradural trans-sphenoidal approach as described by Patterson et al.[28] is performed. With this the sellar tumor is removed under direct vision, while visually controlling also the position of the contralateral ICA. Attention is directed next to the space lateral to the intradural ICA, which is also free from tumor. At this step, the III cranial nerve is widely exposed, and the posterior communicating artery also. Both these structures may have close relationships with the tumor and must be exposed. Then the III cranial nerve (CN) is mobilized from the porus oculomotorius to the orbit using a careful dissection with an arachnoidal knife. Some bleeding resulting from inadvertent opening of the CS close to the orbit is easily controlled with little pieces of Surgicel. When totally released, the III CN is retracted laterally using a nerve microretractor. In this manner the IV CN is handled, also laterally, without having to be exposed, and this widens laterally the opening of Hakuba's triangle. [17] Intracavernous tumor is fully exposed in this manner and can be removed under direct vision [Figure 2]. The tumor pseudocapsule protects the underlying intracavernous ICA from injury, whilst bleeding from the CS is usually minimal, also due to limited dissection. Intracavernous tumor extension was not required per se in our cases for opening of the antero-medial triangle and consequent release of the dural ring for adequate ICA mobilization. After adequate hemostasis, fat grafts of convenient size are placed at the level of the cranial base and/ or in the sella. The T-shaped dural opening is closed with running suture, and the craniotomy closed in the usual manner. A lumbar drainage is left in place for 5 days. Early postoperative CT scanning is obtained for checking adequateness of the tumor removal and absence of relevant surgical complications.

Early postoperative results

There was no operative mortality. Total macroscopical tumor removal, as confirmed by immediate postoperative CT scanning [Figure 3], was achieved in all but one case. Immediate postoperative complications included newly occurring III CN palsy (6 cases), IV CN paresis (1 case), CSF leak (2 cases) and postoperative hematoma requiring surgical evacuation (1 case). Postoperative hematoma occurred in a patient who harbored a giant PRL-secreting highly fibrous adenoma expanding laterally under the MCA deep into the temporal lobe, which could be removed only up to 80% of its mass [Figure 4]a-4c. The one with the adenoma patient exhibited a definitive worsening of his preoperative hemiparesis, and total oculomotor palsy. Both complications regressed to some extent during the late postoperative course.

Postoperative persistent (lasting more than 2 days) diabetes insipidus was not noticed in any of the present patients.

Late postoperative results

Immediate postoperative III CN palsy cleared within 2 months in all but one case. CSF leak required prolonged lumbar drainage and bed rest and resolved within 2 weeks in both patients in whom this complication had occurred [Table 3].

Routine follow-ups, either CT scanning (8 cases) and/ or MRI (6 cases), were done 6-84 months after operation in order to check for possible tumor recurrence.

No case exhibited tumor remnants [Figure 5]a and b, with the exception of the patient with partial tumor removal [Figure 4], who was given postoperative conventional radiation therapy. This lesion was checked with periodical CT controls and appeared to be stable under medical DA treatment 60 months following surgery, when the patient died due to an acute gastrointestinal illness, apparently unrelated to his pituitary adenoma and complicated by mesenteric venous thrombosis. After postsurgical recovery, the patient, though mildly handicapped (Karnofsky 80), had been working.

An Italian patient, harboring an ACTH-secreting adenoma and showing a total ophthalmoplegia preoperatively [Figure 1] and [Figure 3], showed excellent hormonal control following an apparently radical surgery, which matched well with the postoperative imaging [Figure 6]a and b. At the 4-year follow-up, in spite of the stabile neuroimaging examinations, which did not indicate a possible recurrence [Figure 7]a and b, a recurrent though mild elevation of the ACTH (179 pg/mL; normal range, 5-60 pg/mL) was noticed, whilst cortisol was within the range. The patient, also following the suggestions of his endocrinologist, considered prophylactic, lately administrated radiation therapy. Interestingly, a further checkup conducted 4 months later showed completely normal results, and recommendation for radiotherapy was withdrawn. He is now well and still with his ACTH in the normal range, 12 months after that episode. Another patient, a 50-year-old man harboring at the same time a Parkinson's disease, was mildly incapacitated due to the latter (Karnofsky 90); however, he showed no problems related to his PRL-secreting totally removed adenoma. One patient, harboring a non-secreting tumor, died from unrelated causes (myocardial infarction) 34 months following removal of a non-secreting tumor. He had been in good health since then.

Diabetes insipidus was not recorded as a long-term complication. Control of increased preoperative hormonal levels was obtained in all but 3 patients, all of them harboring a PRL-secreting adenoma; however, serum PRL values were only mildly increased and significantly less than the preoperative ones. It should be noted that only 1 of these patients, the one who died of mesenteric thrombosis, was placed under DA treatment following surgery. One patient who had an ACTH-secreting tumor exhibited signs of mild hypopituitarism (FSH level, 0.3 ΅L/L). Four cases of non-secreting adenoma have shown no signs of recurrence until now. The remaining 6 cases showed no signs of increased hormonal values when last checked, 80 to 94 (average, 78) months after operation.

[Table 4] summarizes the 5-year postoperative evolution of the Karnofsky scale of the present patients.


   Discussion Top


General considerations

Pituitary adenomas invading the CS are rare, at least those tumors with clinically and/ or radiologically relevant CS invasion. They are detected mostly in female adults. [1],[7],[20],[39] A female predominance was noted also in the present cases, as there was also predominance of PRL-secreting adenomas.

Dolenc [12] has pointed out that the III cranial nerve possesses a surprising capacity of resisting a long-term though significant tumor compression. However, this does not prevent patients with adenomas invading the CS from showing clinical symptoms of oculomotor dysfunction, very significant in some cases. [12],[41] Two of our 14 patients exhibited a total oculomotor palsy before surgery, which regressed in both cases within a few months after surgery.

Hormonal dysfunctions and headache represented the chief complaint in the present cases, whilst visual disturbances were under-represented when compared with other statistics. [12]

As suggested by recent literature, [7],[9],[20],[23],[27],[30],[39] MRI represented the main diagnostic test. We used the scale proposed by Knosp et al.[20] for evaluating objectively CS tumor invasion.

All patients in the present study represented a high-grade (3 or 4) case according to this classification.

Management philosophy

As a rule, routine trans-sphenoidal surgery does not allow radical removal of a CS pituitary adenoma. [10],[12],[25] Incompletely removed adenomas do not necessarily grow further, and close postoperative observation can be a reasonable clinical strategy.

Medical therapy with DA, and possibly also somatostatin, may be effective in controlling hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Radiotherapy can be also administrated for incompletely removed pituitary adenomas. [16],[34] Although this treatment is not free of complications, also relevant ones such as radiation-induced tumors, [3],[12],[35] there is no doubt that it can be effective. Modern radiosurgery is certainly capable of giving at least the same results as those of traditional radiation therapy, with fewer complications. However, complications can occur also with radiosurgery for CS adenomas, [21],[29] and this must be carefully balanced against the risk of radical surgery.

The present experience was a result of our working mainly in an environment where modern LINAC radiotherapy was available in only a few centers, where quite logically priority was given to patients harboring malignant tumors. We decided that, it was worthwhile trying to cure these lesions with radical surgery, these being CS adenoma benign lesions, and we acted accordingly. This philosophy is obviously hardly recommendable on a routine basis in a high-tech environment.

Widened inferior approaches did not appear to have significantly increased the possibility of radical removal of a pituitary tumor invading the CS, [14] although a more recently published statistic seems to indicate that a fair number of intracavernous adenomas can be eradicated using an extended trans-sphenoidal approach. [19] Endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery was recently advocated for increasing surgical radicality in the removal of CS adenomas. [15] However, the main problem related to such an approach, i.e., narrowness and deepness of the surgical field, has been also recently pointed out in an elegant anatomical study performed by a distinguished group of pioneers in endoscopic pituitary surgery. [5] It is quite possible that advancement in endoscopic technology and increasing surgical experience with direct endoscopic CS adenomas surgery would render other, apparently more invasive techniques obsolete. However, this is not yet the present scenario, as honestly recognized also by the aforementioned group of internationally reputed experts on endoscopic pituitary surgery. [5]

Our experience with craniobasal approaches [36],[37] has led us to consider mainly a transcranial approach for removing pituitary adenomas invading the CS. It should he noted that craniotomy can be performed without sophisticated drilling technology [37] ; whilst also anterior clinoidectomy, which we perform using a high-speed drill, can be performed with routine bone-working instruments, as recently suggested by Chang. [6]

Surgical technique

The technique described in this report was the result of the natural evolution of our surgical experience during the course of 6 years. Our group's philosophy included objective evaluation of postoperative results. As far as CS pituitary adenomas are concerned, early experience led us to change our approach from an epidural one to the one here described due to the following considerations:

a- Epidural CS dissection gave nice exposure of the bulging intracavernous adenoma, as a rule, between the III and the IV cranial nerves; however, the sellar content could not be visualized (maybe also due to lack of experience). This led to early tumor recurrence in 2 cases (as we have stated above) operated upon with an epidural approach and not included in the present study.

b- Epidural dissection invariably led to significant bleeding, particularly when dissecting at the level of the confluence of the Sylvian veins. [18] This forced us to pack significantly the CS.

c- Extended CS dissection requires release of the dural ring (a not risk-free maneuver unless performed by extremely experienced surgeons) and mostly, as a rule, more CS packing.

The facts mentioned above under b- and c- together may well explain the routine occurrence of - though as a rule, temporary - oculomotor palsy in the cases operated upon using an epidural CS dissection, which to our surprise was detected in only 50% of the CS adenoma patients operated upon using the technique herein described. The occurrence of III nerve palsy is obviously a major problem for the patient. However, this is, as a rule, temporary, lasts approximately only 3 months and is commonly present preoperatively.

Basically, we attempted as much as possible to simplify the operative steps of CS dissection as described by master surgeons. [12],[13],[15],[33] We are well aware that this can be criticized. In particular, we know that removal of the tuberculum sellar for obtaining a radical removal of the intrasellar portion of the adenoma can carry several risks, including meningitis as a consequence of CSF leak, or damage of the pituitary stalk. However, the latter never occurred in our experience; and CSF leak, a well-known risk in any Skull-base procedure, occurred in only 2 cases and was adequately managed with well-known remedies, viz., slight elevation of the head and prolonged lumbar drainage. We matched this risk against (1) the (admittedly low) risk of arterial injury during the surgical release of the dural ring, which we do not do in adenomas invading the CS, but also (2) the necessity of packing a bleeding CS in the case of extended dissection of the sinus. If only the Hakuba's triange is opened bleeding is usually minor and packing is as a rule, unnecessary. Possibly also related to this, postoperative total oculomotor palsy occurred inconstantly. Moreover, adequate exposure of the sellar content protected from the risk of incidental injury of the contralateral ICA, [12] because all the relevant neurovascular structures were under direct view in the microsurgical field.

The present technique does not require extensive opening of the dura propria of the optic nerve, and this simplifies the dural closure. As stated above, using the precautions routinely utilized in craniobasal surgery - such as fat grafting complemented by fibrin glue, postoperative lumbar drainage and slight head elevation - was strict routine in our cases.

We were obliged to perform some blind maneuvers in order to remove portions of the tumor from hidden corners; however, this is routine in pituitary adenoma surgery. We want to stress that, as stated above, most relevant neurovascular structures were well exposed and consequently were under control when performing any blind maneuver for tumor removal.

We want to stress also that this technique does not require a sophisticated technological environment, but only a reasonably good microscope and a few micro-instruments, as well as good training in neurosurgical craniobasal anatomy. All these are concrete possibilities also in low-technology neurosurgical environments, as found routinely in less developed countries.


   Results Top


Our study follow-up averages 82 months. Such a period of time does not allow definitive conclusions regarding possible tumor recurrence at a later stage, although such an evidence would seem to be extremely unlikely. [38]

Total macroscopical tumor removal, achieved in all but one case, was assessed by routine early postoperative CT scanning and late postoperative either CT scan and/ or MRI. This matched well with the positive evolution of clinical symptoms following the operation. In 1 case, increase in postoperative hormonal serum levels led us to consider prophylactic, lately administrated radiation therapy, in spite of the lack of signs of recurrence at the serial neuroimaging controls. Recommendation for radiotherapy was ultimately withdrawn following a further hormonal checkup 4 months later, at which ACTH and cortisol serum levels appeared to be well within the normal range.

Surgical cure of an invasive adenoma is always a challenge because these tumors spread extradurally without a real capsule, and neoplastic cells can be easily left behind. [22],[26],[32] However, at least until now, we have no evidence to conclude that surgery was not curative in the present cases, and consequently no reason for indicating routine postoperative radiation therapy. Postoperative evaluation of Karnofsky's made in our patient was positive and compared favorably with the preoperative one.

Surgical complications were not negligible: 13% of patients had postoperative CSF leak; 50% had oculomotor palsy; in addition to a postoperative hematoma and related complications occurring, however, in an extremely difficult case. However, in all but one case, complications either regressed spontaneously, as in the case of oculomotor palsy, or were easily dealt with routine postoperative maneuvers, as in the case of CSF leak.


   Conclusions Top


Pituitary adenomas invading the CS represent a challenge for neurosurgeons. However, several treatment modalities are presently available, including preoperative medical treatment with the aim of reducing the tumor in size in order to make it amenable to radical trans-sphenoidal surgery; and radiosurgery, whether or not preceded by partial surgical removal.

However, it must not be forgotten that these are benign tumors, possibly amenable to surgical cure. On the basis of this consideration, some authors have described their experiences with direct approaches to CS, either from below or transcranially, and have recommended these approaches. All the techniques used for possible radical surgery have obvious advantages and disadvantages, as expected, but also have in common the peculiarity of being definitely technically demanding ones. We have described here a transcranial approach that does not necessarily require sophisticated equipment, can be used also in a relatively less sophisticated technological environment and apparently make cavernous sinus adenoma surgery a little less demanding when compared with the classically described techniques for CS surgical dissection; this approach, at the same time, allows the adenoma to be, at least apparently, totally removed in the vast majority of cases. This is particularly a relevant issue in a low-tech environment and/ or in a developing country, where postoperative adjuvant therapy cannot be easily administered to any patient, and regular follow-ups are relatively difficult. Certainly, endoscopic trans-sphenoidal removal of CS adenomas represents the future. However, the present result should be considered as a bottom line to be reached, as far as radicality of tumor removal by the new techniques of minimally invasive craniobasal surgery is concerned.

 
   References Top

1.Ahmadi J, North CM, Segall HD, Zee CS, Weiss MH. Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:257-62.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Al-Mefty O, Smith RR. Surgery of tumours invading the cavernous sinus. Surg Neurol 1988;30:370-81.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Brada M, Ford D, Ashley S, Bliss JM, Crowley S, Mason M, et al. Risk of second brain tumour after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. Br Med J 1992;304:1343-6.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sella: Towards functional endoscopic pituitary surgery (FEPS). Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1998;41:66-73.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Galzio R, Iaconetta G, de Divitiis E, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic transnasal approach to the cavernous sinus versus transcranial route: Anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2005;56:379-88.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Chang DJ. The "No- Drill" technique of anterior clinoidectomy: A cranial base approach to the paraclinoid and parasellar region. Neurosurgery 2009;64:96-106.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Cottier JP, Destrieux C, Brunereau L, Bertrand P, Moreau L, Jan M, et al. Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenoma: MR imaging Radiology 2000;215:463-9.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Couldwell WT. Transsphenoidal and transcranial surgery for pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol 2004;69:237-56.   Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Delgrange E, Duprez T, Maiter D. Influence of parasellar extension of macroprolactinomas defined by magnetic resonance imaging on their responsiveness to dopamine agonist therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;64:456-62.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Dickerman RD, Oldfield EH. Basis of persistent and recurrent cushing disease: An analysis of findings at repeated pituitary surgery. J Neurosurg 2002;97:1343-9.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Dolenc VV. Transcranial epidural approach to pituitary tumours extending beyond the sella. Neurosurgery 1997;41:542-50.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Dolenc VV. Surgery of tumours originating in or invading the cavernous sinus. In: Long DM, editor. Surgery of Skull Base Tumours. Vol. 12. Boston: Blackwell; 1992. p. 211-21.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Eisenberg MB, Al-Mefty O, De Monte F, Burson GT. Benign nonmeningeal tumours of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 1999;44:949-54.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Fraioli B, Esposito V, Santoro A, Iannetti G, Giuffre R, Cantore G. Transmaxillosphenoidal approach to tumours invading the medial compartment of the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1995;82:63-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Frank G, Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cavernous sinus: Surgical approaches. Neurosurgery 2002;50:675.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Gilliot O, Khalil T, Irthum B, Zasadny X, Verrelle P, Tauveron I, et al. Radiotherapy of pituitary adenomas: State of the art. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2007;68:337-48.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Hakuba A, Tanaka K, Suzuki T, Nishimura S. A combined orbozygomatic infratemporal epidural and subdural approach for lesion involving the entire cavernous sinus. J Neurosurgery 1989;71:669-704.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Kawase T, van Loveren HR, Keller JT, Tew JM Jr. Meningeal architecture of the cavernous sinus: Clinical and Surgical implications. Neurosurgery 1996;39:527-36.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Kitano M, Taneda M, Shimono T, Nakao Y. Extended transsphenoidal approach for surgical management or pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2008;108:26-36.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: A magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993;33:610-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Kuo JS, Chen JC, Yu C, Zelman V, Giannotta SL, Petrovich Z, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for benign cavernous sinus tumours: Quantitative analysis of treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery 2004;54:1385-93.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Laws ER Jr. Comment to Dolenc [11] Neurosurgery 1997;41:551.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Liu JK, Couldwell WT. Contemporary management of prolactinomas. Neurosurg Focus 2004;16:E2.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.MacKay A, Hosobuchi Y. Treatment of intracavernous extensions of pituitary adenomas. Surg Neurol 1978;10:377-83.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Mattozo CA, Dusick JR, Esposito F, Mora H, Cohan P, Malkasian D, et al. Suboptimal sphenoid and sellar exposure: A consistent finding in patients treated with repeat transsphenoidal surgery for residual endocrine-inactive macroadenomas. Neurosurgery 2006;58:857-65.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Meij BP, Lopes MB, Ellegala DB, Alden TD, Laws ER Jr. The long-term significance of microscopic dural invasion in 354 patients with pituitary adenomas treated with transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 2002;96:195-208.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Moreau L, Cottier JP, Bertrand P, Destrieux C, Jan M, Sonier CB, et al. MRI diagnosis of sinus cavernous invasion by pituitary adenomas. J Radiol 1998;79:241-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Patterson RH Jr, Snow RB, Lavyne MH, Lee BC, Morgello S. Craniotomy versus transsphenoidal excision of large pituitary tumours: The usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in guiding the operative approach. Neurosurgery 1986;19:59-64.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Petrovich Z, Yu C, Giannotta SL, Zee CS, Apuzzo ML. Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma: Early results. Neurosurgery 2003;53:51-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Rajaraman V, Schulder M. Postoperative MRI appearance after transsphenoidal pituitary tumour resection. Surg Neurol 1999;52:592-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Sabit I, Schaefer SD, Couldwell WT. Extradural extranasal combined transmaxillary transsphenoidal approach to the cavernous sinus: A minimally invasive microsurgical model. Laryngoscope 2000;110:286-91.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Scheithauer BW, Kovacs KT, Laws ER Jr, Randall RV. Pathology of invasive pituitary tumours with special reference to functional classification. J Neurosurg 1986;65:733-44.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Sekhar LN, Moller AR. Operative management of tumours involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1986;64:79-89.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Selman WR, Laws ER Jr, Scheithauer BW, Carpenter SM. The occurrence of dural invasion in pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 1986;64:402-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Spallone A. Meningioma as a sequel of radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1982;25:68-72.   Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Spallone A. Skull base surgery program of the Republic of Cuba: Establishing a demanding subspecialty in a developing country. Skull Base 2004;14:175-81.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Spallone A, Rizzo A, Konovalov AN, Giuffrθ R. Fronto-orbito-zigomatic approach: A technical modification. Skull Base 1996;2:125-8.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Tanaka Y, Hongo K, Tada T, Sakai K, Kakizawa Y, Kobayashi S. Growth pattern and rate in residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: Correlations among tumour volume doubling time, patient age, and MIB-1 index. J Neurosurg 2003;98:359-65.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Vieira JO Jr, Cukiert A, Liberman B. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging criteria for cavernous sinus invasion in patients with pituitary adenomas: Logistic regression analysis and correlation with surgical findings. Surg Neurol 2006;65:130-5.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Zhang R, Zhou LF, Mao Y. Microsurgical treatment of nonmeningeal tumours of the cavernous sinus. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2005;85:1373-78.   Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Zielinski G, Podgorski JK, Koziarski A, Warczynska A, Zgliczynski W, Makowska A. Surgical treatment of invasive pituitary adenomas (somatotropinoma or corticotropinoma) Neurol Neurochir Pol 2003;37:1239-55.   Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Wilson CB, Mindermann T, Tyrrell JB. Extrasellar, intracavernous sinus adrenocorticotropin-releasing adenoma causing cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:1774-7.  Back to cited text no. 42
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Successful treatment for giant pituitary adenomas through diverse transcranial approaches in a series of 15 consecutive patients
Fuyou Guo, Laijun Song, Jie Bai, Peichao Zhao, Hongwei Sun, Xianzhi Liu, Bo Yang, Shukai Wang
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2012; 114(7): 885
[VIEW]



 

 
Top
  
Previous article Next article

    

 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Browse articles
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Discussion
    Results
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2424    
    Printed138    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded581    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal